HeHeHe …
Threaded discussions are a technology tool that I am somewhat familiar with after using it in my Teacher as Researcher Master’s course with Dr. Koppenhaver. This is a tool that is insanely useful for teachers and students alike. It has many advantages and only a couple of disadvantages that I have seen so far in using it as a student in my Master’s courses.
As a student, the advantages to using threaded discussions are great in number. We, as college students, use these discussions to respond to articles we’ve read, to share ideas, to ask questions and compare notes with other students for help or advice, and post things for the professor to know that we are actively participating in group discussions. I also found these discussions helpful in my research class for feedback on my project and suggestions on how to make it more efficient or interesting for my students. In this technology course we are learning to use it in a real classroom setting. We have read and responded to articles, supplied responses to each other and answered meaningful questions about topics we are interested in.
In a regular classroom setting, threaded discussions would be a great way for students to share their ideas and responses WITHOUT Interruption. This is the biggest advantage as a student to me. So many times I have been in class, had a good idea, only to be drowned out by others who want to toot their own horns or look (to the professor) like they are an expert on the subject discussed. Many times I have found that I am drowned out by this, lose my train of thought, and forget to go back and address my point or concern. I also have found that the conversation may move too quickly for me to get in a word edgewise, thus, again, losing my thought and it’s never heard. Who knows, it could be earth-shattering, ground breaking stuff, right? (doubtful. haha)
With threaded discussions, though, I have found several wonderful plus factors: 1) no one is drowned out, we all have a chance to respond and have our thoughts expressed, 2) everyone can “talk” and “listen” at the same time, at their own rate and comfort level, and 3) no one is interrupted and talked over, making the student feel like what they are contributing is worthwhile. What a positive experience!
As a teacher, threaded discussions serve a myriad of purposes. Some overviews: assessment, true measure of whether students are completing assignments or not, true feelings of students, collaborative working between students as they respond to each other, etc.
For assessment, the actual threads could be analyzed for grammar, depth, sentence structure, spelling errors, etc. (but only if the teacher emphasized and explained these expectations when introducing the threaded discussions to the class.) Informal assessment could also be completed on these discussions for teachers to learn to redirect their teaching based on the “missed” skills or holes in the threaded discussion. This is assessment more for the teacher’s good than allotting a grade to the student.
For a true measure of completion of assignments, all a teacher must do is check the number and depth of the thread paths each student submits. If the student is completing 20-30 threads with no depth, the teacher may choose to redirect and share an example of an acceptable thread with that student. If a student is completing 1-3 threads of thoughtful depth and clarity and addressing the needs of the discussion, no redirection is needed. You are going to have both ends of the spectrum with threaded discussions – the point is to assist your students in finding the happy medium for what you expect out of them.
When thinking about students openly sharing about a topic, it is important to help them understand that this threaded discussion board is a safe outlet for sharing their feelings and thoughts on the selected topics. If there are students who are not participating in the right way, the teacher needs to abruptly stop inappropriate behavior and re-establish the “safe” gateway to the discussion board.
This falls hand in hand with collaborative work in the classroom. In a classroom with an open, honest, and safe environment, students will feel empowered to share their learning and respond to each other about topics discussed in class and on the board. When students are leading these discussions, the teacher acts merely as a facilitator and should foster that open and shared learning environment. Even though we are the instigator of topics and initially teaching the mechanics behind the threaded discussion, ultimately we can step back and the students will learn to talk amongst themselves and collaboration naturally happens.
As a teacher, what a powerful tool for upper grades classrooms, especially at the high and middle school level. Not only can you assess and read posts from your classroom or home, you can also offer important feedback without having to shuffle through 30+ papers and handwriting each response. Another way to do feedback in sync with threaded discussions (so the feedback would remain private) would be to institute something like NiceNet into your classes, so you are sending positive feedback to all students who are on the right track and only personalizing those messages to the students who need assistance with a certain skill or post.
One way I thought of that teachers might be able to use this in a younger (primary) classroom would be to have the threaded discussion board open, and hold a discussion aloud. The teacher would be the facilitator of the computer and the board, and would basically be performing dictation on the topics covered. For instance, in my kindergarten classroom, I may have a topic open on pumpkins. I may be holding an open discussion and ask students to name pumpkin facts they have learned in order for us to create a KWL chart for the week’s unit. My way of completing the threaded discussion would be to create a strand for pumpkins, then type in the student’s name who speaks out. I would type exactly what they tell me into a response to the pumpkin thread. The way I would use this to drive instruction would be to assess what information they understood from my teaching and what I need to review. Also, this is an AWESOME way to see which students are speaking up and which ones you need to call on more. The overachieving “question-answerers” would be weeded out with this.
What a great tool to institute no matter what grade you teach! Woohoo!